Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Byrum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1934No. 11472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

On November 1, 1929, H. M. Anderson and J, F. Pitts executed and delivered to Mrs. A. C. Byrum a promissory note, in the sum of ⅞400, bearing 10 per cent, interest from date thereof, and providing for a contingent attorney fee. Before the institution of this suit, J. F. Pitts died intestate, leaving surviving his wife, Mrs. Mary Pitts, and a son, Marcus Pitts; and Mrs. Anderson died intestate, leaving surviving her husband, H. M. Anderson, and the following children: Mrs. Bela Bracken, Dillie Anderson, James Anderson, Mrs. Mary Pitts, Mrs. Mary Bris-coe, Clarence Anderson, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrar v. Talley & HesterTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Blum v. SteinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Texas Land Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Comer v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Pate v. VardemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Sav. Bank of Detroit v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Arouani v. BattisticCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Aut-O-Cel Co. v. Houston Plastic Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Barnes v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Arouani v. BattisticCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API