Blum v. Stein
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. G. Hazlewood. Leon & H. Blum, through their agent, Zemanskey, sued out attachment on the ground that appellee was about to convert his property, or a part thereof, into money, for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. G. Hazlewood. Leon & H. Blum, through their agent, Zemanskey, sued out attachment on the ground that appellee was about to convert his property, or a part thereof, into money, for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors. The affidavit was made by Zemanskey, agent for appellants, and on the same day the writ of attachment was issued, and placed in the hands of S. R. Perry, sheriff of Harrison county, Texas, and was by him levied upon the stock of goods of appellee, valued by the sheriff at two thousand six hundred and…
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by appellants to recover on an open account the sum of one thou*615sand seven hundred and eight dollars and sixty-eight cents, besides interest, and attorney’s fees, which, under the contract on which the goods were bought, was to be paid in the event the claim bad to be enforced by suit.
An attachment was sued out and levied on a stock of goods that belonged to the appellee, and this was sold during the pendency of the action under an order of the court. The appellee admitted the justice of the claim sued on, but pleaded in reconvention that the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Maybe, Kahn & Freiberg v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Hollenbach v. SchnabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Rentfrow v. Lancaster & TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Anderson v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.