Aut-O-Cel Co. v. Houston Plastic Products, Inc.

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

Two appeals arising from four related causes of action are presented. Disregarding of jury findings by the trial court is the basis for complaint. We affirm.

Houston Plastic Products, Inc. sued and recovered judgment against Aut-O-Cel Company for debt. This portion of the judgment is not assailed. Ancillary to its action for debt, Houston Plastics obtained issuance of a writ of attachment against physical assets of Aut-O-Cel. The latter defendant filed a cross-action alleging damages for breach of warranty and for wrongful attachment.

Aut-O-Cel, as dealer, marketed a…