Arouani v. Battistic
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
In the motion for rehearing by Khalil and Abdullah Arouani (paragraph 8, page 3), the position is assumed that the judgment of March 18, 1937, mentioned in our original opinion, was not a final judgment and did not become so until after the judgment of April 24, 1937, was rendered at the subsequent term of court
*674This position, seemingly, is in conflict with the position taken in the brief filed for appellants prior to original submission. At page S of the brief appellants say: “The pica of contribution was not filed until April 13, 1937, which was long subsequent to the date of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heatley v. W. P. Ponder & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Bankers' Lloyds v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Anderson v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934