Farmers-Kissinger Market House Co., Inc. v. Reading
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the dismissal of plaintiff’s bill inequity. It presents two questions: (1) whether the ordinance of a third-class city prohibiting the vehicular use of private driveways across the sidewalks of nine blocks along the busiest street of that city was enacted under legislative authority; and (2) (assuming the first question to be answered in the affirmative) does that ordinance deprive a citizen of his property without compensation, that is, without that due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?
Pl…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
- William Laubach & Sons v. EastonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Dufour v. MaizeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.