Legal Opinion

Farmers-Kissinger Market House Co., Inc. v. Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 23, 1933No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the dismissal of plaintiff’s bill inequity. It presents two questions: (1) whether the ordinance of a third-class city prohibiting the vehicular use of private driveways across the sidewalks of nine blocks along the busiest street of that city was enacted under legislative authority; and (2) (assuming the first question to be answered in the affirmative) does that ordinance deprive a citizen of his property without compensation, that is, without that due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution?

Pl…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Jackman v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. William Laubach & Sons v. EastonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Dufour v. MaizeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API