Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goodfellow v. Rundle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 23, 1964No. Appeal, 340Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Opinion by
Wright J.,
Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part :
I agree that the order of the court below should be affirmed. I do not agree with all that is said in the majority opinion, or that it is necessary to say it. Furthermore, I am not in accord with the conclusion that this appeal should be certified to the Supreme Court. See my dissent in Piestrak Unemployment Compensation Case, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 242, 163 A. 2d 897.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Susquehanna Collieries Division of the M. A. Hanna Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960