Legal Opinion

Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Link Aviation, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1959No. Civ. 5917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

This is the usual patent infringement action requesting the usual relief. The problems involved therein are rendered difficult because of the complex nature of the inventions claimed and the machines involved. Plaintiff’s devices principally contemplate an all-electrieally operated blind flight airplane trainer as distinguished from pneumatically or hydraulically operated machines. The lengthy record is made up of evidence involving aeronautics, electrical engineering, aerodynamics and mathematics, the understanding of which taxes the capacity of one untrained therein.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  3. Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. Banning v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API