Legal Opinion
Banning v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 5, 1974No. Civ. A. 71-H-1234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
Findings of Facts
1. In this action for alleged patent infringement, the plaintiff seeks damages for past infringement. The patent in suit, Banning patent 2,761,015 entitled PUSH BUTTON TELEPHONE NUMBER SELECTOR (herein referred to as “the Banning patent”), expired August 28, 1973.
2. Plaintiff is Joe Doyle Banning, the patentee and owner of the Banning patent in suit.
3. Defendant is Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a corporation having an office and a principal place of business in Houston, Texas. In furnishing telephone services in Texas and elsewhere,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kalkowski v. Ronco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Alpkem Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1986
- Ares-Serono, Inc. v. Organon International B.V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Amerace Corp. v. Ferro Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1982