Legal Opinion

Barber v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1935No. 25697. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

This is an action brought by the parents to recover for the wrongful death of a minor son. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict against the defendant city, and from a judgment on the verdict, the city has appealed.

"While there are seven formal assignments of error, all have been argued together, and from the manner of presentation we gather that the appellant, as its principal ground for reversal, takes the position that there was not sufficient evidence of its negligence to take the case to the jury, and that its motion for judgment n. o. v. should, therefore,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zolawenski v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Einseidler v. County of WhitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ray v. HinesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gerrie v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Aores v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Lyle v. FioritoWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Martin v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API