Legal Opinion
Lyle v. Fiorito
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1936No. 26187. Department TwoPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Fifteenth avenne northeast is a paved arterial highway, running north through King county from the Seattle city limits. It is crossed at right angles by east One Hundred Forty-fifth street, a non-arterial road, which, prior to 1934, was unpaved.
During the summer of 1934, N. Fiorito entered into a contract with King county for the pavement of One Hundred Forty-fifth street from Fifteenth avenue eastward. In the course of paving* the street, the contractor took down an arterial stop sign, which had been placed on One Hundred Forty-fifth street just east of the northeast corner of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Beach v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Mathias v. EichelbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Church v. ShafferWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Ray v. HinesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Wagshal v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.