Legal Opinion

Brunswick Corp. v. Riegel Textile Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 19, 1983No. 82 C 4374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Brunswick Corporation (“Brunswick”) sued Riegel Textile Corporation (“Riegel”) pursuant to federal antitrust statutes as well as state law. Jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and the pendent jurisdiction doctrine. Presently before the Court is Riegel’s motion to dismiss Counts III, IV and V pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Riegel also seeks dismissal of the state law claims set forth in Counts I, II and VI. For reasons set forth below, Riegel’s motion is granted.

In considering motions to dismiss, we take as true…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Riegel Textile Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Harris v. WGN Continental Broadcasting Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  3. Metro Communications Co. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Riegel Textile Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Brunswick Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Riegel Textile Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API