Metro Communications Co. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s February 15, 1991 motion for summary judgment. In this motion, Defendant argues, in major part, that an implied covenant of good faith does not limit its right unconditionally to contract with Plaintiffs’ competitors. Oral argument was heard on January 30, 1992.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. 1 Plaintiffs Metro Communications Company (“Metro”), Royal Radio Sales & Service, Inc. (“Royal”), and Henderson Glass, Inc. (“Henderson”) are…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metro Communications Company and Royal Radio Sales and Service, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Tele-Port, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Laitram Machinery, Inc. v. Carnitech A/SDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1995
- Dunn v. CCH Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011