Legal Opinion
Paldrmic v. Altria Corporate Services, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 20, 2004No. 03-C-0649PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dragan Paldrmic commenced this putative class action in state court alleging that defendants Altria Corporate Services, Inc. and Philip Morris USA, Inc. (collectively “defendant” or “Philip Morris”) violated Wisconsin statutory and common law by manipulating the tar and nicotine content of Marlboro light cigarettes and representing to the public that such cigarettes contained lower amounts of tar and nicotine than was actually the case. Philip Morris removed the suit to this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), which authorizes the removal of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- California v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Parks v. Guidant Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
- California v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.