Legal Opinion

California v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 24, 2007No. Docket Nos. 04-5974-cv(L), 04-6056-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.

This interlocutory appeal arises from lawsuits originally filed by the States of California and New Hampshire in their respective state courts against corporations that manufactured, refined, marketed, or distributed gasoline containing methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”). Refiners have added MTBE to some gasoline since the late 1970s in order to enhance its octane content. The use of MTBE significantly increased after 1990, when Congress established the Reformulated Gasoline Program (“RFG Program”) as part of its amendments to the Clean Air Act (“CAA”). See…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RosarioDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API