Legal Opinion

McCann v. Lewis

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, County of Tolo. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note, payable to Sarah Ann Cooper, or bearer. The answer admits the execution of the note, but denies its transfer to the plaintiff for a valuable consideration, and sets up that Sarah Ann Cooper was, at the time, the wife of C. Cooper, and that the consideration of the note proceeded from him 3 that, in April, 1856, he agreed to extend its payment to April 15th, 1858, provided the interest was paid at the end of every twelve months 3 that he died prior to April 15th, 1857 3 and that no administration has been had on his estate.

The only question raised by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guy v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Emeric v. TamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadows v. . CozartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hollywood Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Dean v. Sedan Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Meadowcraft v. WalshMontana Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API