Legal Opinion

Meadowcraft v. Walsh

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Glarhe County. Action upon promissory notes. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs by Buck, J. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion: Action by plaintiffs to recover amounts due on four promissory notes made by defendant. One note for one hundred and ten dollars, and interest, was made and delivered May 1,1885, to the firm of Jurgens & Price.

Read the full summary

Appeal from First Judicial District, Lewis and Glarhe County. Action upon promissory notes. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs by Buck, J. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion: Action by plaintiffs to recover amounts due on four promissory notes made by defendant. One note for one hundred and ten dollars, and interest, was made and delivered May 1,1885, to the firm of Jurgens & Price. To escape the statute of limitations plaintiffs plead the payment on said note of twenty-five dollars, made December 8, 1890. Another note made on February 8, 1888, was…

1Opinion of the CourtHuNT, J.

— An attentive examination of the testimony in this record fails to satisfy us that the findings of fact are against the weight of evidence. By the authority of this court they must therefore stand as approved by the trial judge.

The issue of the statute of limitations is at once disposed by the fact that on December 20, 1890, defendant was given a credit of twenty-five dollars, with his consent, on the note of May, 1885.

The assignment for the benefit of creditors, made by Jurgens & Price on June 7, 1889, included “promissory notes, debts, choses in action, etc., belonging to said parties of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Gage v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Cottle v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Robertson v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Roberts v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. SimpsonMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rossiter v. LoeberMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Antelope County Bank v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Campbell v. IrvineMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Lewis v. WeyerhorstMontana Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API