Town of Gilbert Prosecutor's Office v. Downie
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We have been asked to decide’whether the amount of restitution to be paid by a defendant convicted of contracting without a license may be reduced by any value conferred on the homeowner. We hold that such a reduction is appropriate.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In January 2005, Richard and Felicita Rada hired Mitchell Matykiewiez to perform remodeling work on them home in Gilbert, Arizona. Over the course of nine months the Radas paid $52,784.22 to Matykiewiez. Matykiewicz claims to have hired licensed subcontractors to do the work, which included…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. TzitzikalakisNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. David H. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Sho Jay MatsumaruCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Garza v. Swift Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Addison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Vivek a PatelArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Baker v. Dolphin Beach Rental & Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. QuijadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.