Legal Opinion
Chin v. City of Baltimore
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 22, 2003No. CIV.A. CCB 02-1551PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Michael Chin and Sweet N Spicy Foods Inc, have filed an action against Baltimore City, the Baltimore City Police Department, and Officer Michael V. Wilhelm. The Baltimore Police Department and Baltimore City have filed motions to dismiss. The United States has filed a motion to substitute the United States for Officer Wilhelm. Officer Wilhelm has filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The issues have been fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons set forth below, the court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carter v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Estate of Anderson v. StrohmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Franklin v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Curry v. South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Jones v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Bradley v. Baltimore Police Dep'tDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.