Legal Opinion

People v. Haddad

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1982No. Docket No. 58470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court granted a motion to suppress and subsequently dismissed the charges against defendant. From that dismissal, the people appeal as of right.

The trial court suppressed the evidence because defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his bedroom. The bedroom was located in such a manner that it was normally out of the public’s view. The officer had to get extremely close to the window in order to be able to see inside. The court concluded that the officer had no right to peer through the bedroom window when he only had a suspicion of an assault and battery and a mere…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. DavidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. DuganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Taylor v. MI Dept Nat ResCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Taylor v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Taylor v. Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API