Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 14, 2007No. 05-2732PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J., joined by Gibbons, J.,
ALDRICH, D.J. (pp. 458-65), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Alan Taylor seeks review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants, asserting that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the conservation officer’s conduct did not constitute a search or an invasion of privacy, (2) in finding that the conservation officer was entitled to qualified immunity, and (3) in determining that plaintiff lacked standing to seek prospective injunctive relief against the director of the Department of Natural Resources in her official…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Christopher Covey v. Assessor of Ohio CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Cary King v. Louisiana Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Moher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.