Legal Opinion · Dissent
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 14, 2007No. 05-2732Published
1DissentAnn Aldrich, District Judge
I write separately to disagree with the panel’s analysis of the Fourth Amendment issues. Therefore, I believe that the district court should be reversed in part and affirmed in part.
I. Constitutionality Of Search
A. Katz v. United States Framework
The Fourth Amendment states in relevant part, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause.” U.S. Const, amend. IV. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.