Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Wondergem

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 2, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 308PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

An appeal was taken to this court by the City of Tucson from a minute entry order of superior court, Pima County, granting a new trial to the appellee and vacating the judgment theretofore entered. On September 9, 1966, we dismissed this appeal on our own motion for the reason that the order appealed from was not an appealable order, hence we were without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Arizona Corporation Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co., 83 Ariz. 135, 137, 317 P.2d 562 (1957).

It is well settled under our Rules of Civil Procedure that a judgment or order from which an appeal is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Mageary v. HoytArizona Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Baumann v. TutonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Gabriel Ex Rel. Gabriel v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API