Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,817PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BURCH, J.:

The plaintiffs ask for a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the defendant as judge of the district .court to set aside an order of the court.

Briefly stated, the essential facts disclosed at the hearing are these. The plaintiffs own a tract of land which they leased for oil and. gas purposes. The American Gas Company has gas rights in an adjoining tract. Two producing wells were bored on the plaintiffs’ land and several producing wells were bored on the American Gas Company’s land. Pipes were laid on the plaintiffs’ land connecting all…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  4. City of Detroit v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. McHenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Hopkins v. HowatSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Estey v. HoldrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API