Legal Opinion

Tawas & Bay County Railroad v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1880PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

An ajaplication is now made, after cause shown, for a peremptory mandamus to compel the respondent to set aside an order granting an injunction, which is claimed to be beyond his authority, and which lie has refused to disturb. As the grounds of the motion do not rest on the mere impropriety but upon the illegality of this •order, and as some points of jurisdiction are raised both as to that of the respondent and our own, a brief reference to the nature of the controversy is necessary. It will not be important to go into particulars very far.

The injunction was issued in a suit in equity…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barry v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Arnold v. BrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. People ex rel. Township of La Grange v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. People ex rel. Messler v. SimonsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. People ex rel. Port Huron & Gratiot Railway Co. v. Judge of St. Clair CircuitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. RitzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City of Detroit v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Steggles v. National Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API