Estey v. Holdren
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the presiding judge of the Montgomery county district court *386to grant a jury trial in an action pending in his court in which the petitioner herein is plaintiff and four corporations are defendants.
The verified motion for the writ makes it appear that the action in which the jury trial is demanded as a matter of right is for the recovery of a money judgment on three common-law counts:
The first pleaded the breach of a certain contract whereby four defendant corporations bound themselves to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte SimonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Camp v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kimball v. ConnorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- Atchison Street Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Culbertson v. Iola Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Waggener v. Seever Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Farmer v. LoofbourrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hasty v. PierpontSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.