Legal Opinion

Malmquist v. Leeds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1955No. 36,552PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an order granting defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

On September 4, 1950, the plaintiff fell down an open stair well while visiting at the home of the defendants located on the shore of Horse Shoe Lake near Backus, Minnesota. The defendants are husband and wife, and the defendant Clarence Leeds is the plaintiff’s brother. Because of the nature of the questions involved on this appeal, it is necessary to examine the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Knox v. City of Granite FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Page v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. W. S. Fowler Rental Equipment Company v. SkipperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Hanson v. ChristensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Buchholz v. SteitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API