Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Clemente
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 31, 2008No. 07-1021PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
Michael Clemente and Geraldine Wasz-kiewicz (“the plaintiffs”) appeal the District Court’s order, which denied their motion to vacate an arbitration award, and instead confirmed the award. The arbitration award dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims against Kevin Nohilly, Gustav Albert Fin-gado, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“the defendants”), and denied them any relief. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the order of the District Court.
I
We write exclusively for the parties, who are familiar with the factual context and legal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Mustafa v. Amore St. John, LLCSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Provost v. Intrafusion Holding Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013