Legal Opinion
Provost v. Intrafusion Holding Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-758-RGAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (D.I. 7) filed by Petitioner Paul E. Provost, Jr., a Cross-Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (D.I. 15) filed by Respondent Intrafusion Holding Corporation, and associated briefing (D.I. 16, 17, 20). For the reasons discussed, the Motion to Vacate is denied, and the Cross-Motion to Confirm is granted.
BACKGROUND
Provost and Intrafusion agreed to a sale of Provost’s company, intraFUSION (“the Company”) to Intrafusion and other companies, including Lake Capital, pursuant to a Unit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Merit Insurance Company v. Leatherby Insurance Company A/K/A Western Employers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Robert J. Lyeth v. Chrysler Corporation, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fatima Dolores Rodas v. La Madeleine of Texas, Inc., La Madeleine De Corps, Inc., La Madeleine, Inc., La Madeleine Management Company, Inc., and Luis Blas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Narayan v. Association of Apartment Owners of Kapalua Bay Condominium.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017