Legal Opinion
Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 29, 1994No. 92-1814PublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Manuel Kaplan, Carol Kaplan (“Kaplans”), and M.K. Investments, Inc. (“MKI”), appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It confirmed an arbitration award arbitrators appointed under the rules of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange (“the Exchange”) had entered in favor of appellee First Options of Chicago, Inc. (“First Options”).
The Kaplans argue that the arbitration panel lacked jurisdiction over them. First Options says that the Kaplans have waived any jurisdictional objections. Because…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Dluhos v. StrasbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Dayhoff Inc. v. H.J. Heinz Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Bruno Lloyd v. Hovensa, LLC Wyatt, V.I., Inc. Bruno Lloyd v. Hovensa, LLC Wyatt, V.I., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.