Legal Opinion

State v. Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1993No. 91-2417PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Appellant has raised ten propositions of law. Each has been thoroughly reviewed and, for the reasons stated below, we find all to be without merit, and uphold appellant’s conviction and death sentence.

I

Appellant alleges in. his first proposition of law that the trial court’s jury instruction on specific intent was not adequate.

However, appellant failed to object to this instruction. Appellant’s failure to object waives this issue on appeal absent plain error. State v. Thompson (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 1, 13, 514 N.E.2d 407, 419.

A jury instruction must be viewed in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API