Clawson v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. In it he alleged that he was denied adequate assistance of trial counsel and of appellate counsel. The relief he sought was a new trial or a new appeal. The post-conviction trial court denied relief on both claims. We conclude that petitioner was denied adequate assistance of appellate counsel and reverse the denial of that claim for relief.
In 1966, petitioner was convicted of robbery. He was represented by appointed counsel during trial. He appealed, and different counsel was appointed to represent him on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arthur M. Clawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Teague v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- United States v. ClawsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Cross v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.