Legal Opinion

Teague v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 2002No. 00C-12089; A113384PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*579LINDER, J.

Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief, in which he alleged two grounds for relief. First, petitioner claimed that his dangerous offender sentence was imposed unconstitutionally under the principles announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000). Second, petitioner claimed that he received constitutionally inadequate assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to argue that the dangerous offender sentence was unconstitutional. The trial court dismissed the petition, and we affirm.

The pertinent…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. De La PazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Miller v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Page v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Montez v. CzerniakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API