Landrith v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Bret Landrith appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint (appeal No. 12-3302) and imposition of filing restrictions on him (appeal No. 12-3332). The parties are familiar with the facts, so we do not recite them here.
Appeal No. 12-3302
The district court’s dismissal of the First Amended Complaint is affirmed under the pleading principles set forth in Bell Atlantic Co. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-80, 129 S.Ct. 1937,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landrith v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Landrith v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 2014