Legal Opinion

Landrith v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 10, 2013No. 12-3302, 12-3332UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Bret Landrith appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint (appeal No. 12-3302) and imposition of filing restrictions on him (appeal No. 12-3332). The parties are familiar with the facts, so we do not recite them here.

Appeal No. 12-3302

The district court’s dismissal of the First Amended Complaint is affirmed under the pleading principles set forth in Bell Atlantic Co. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-80, 129 S.Ct. 1937,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Landrith v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Landrith v. SchmidtSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API