Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Landrith v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 15, 2013No. Nos. 12-3302, 12-3332PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On September 10, 2013, we ordered Bret D. Landrith to show cause why this court should not impose filing restrictions on him. Mr. Landrith has timely responded, but he has failed to demonstrate good cause why the proposed filing restrictions should not be imposed. It is therefore ordered that the filing restrictions proposed in this court’s September 10, 2013, order, a copy of which is attached to this order, shall take effect immediately upon entry of this order.

*1172ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT IMPOSE FILING RESTRICTIONS ON BRET D. LANDRITH

Bret D. Landrith is the pro se…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Cotner v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re LandrithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Landrith v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

4Cited by57 opinions

  1. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. MilasinovichDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  2. (HC)Givens v. TrateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Archuleta v. ChavezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  4. Armstead v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
  5. Belinda Robertson v. Jerome Johnson and The Forensic FirmDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API