Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Bergendahl-Knight Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1918No. Appeal, No. 100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 100, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1915, No- 62, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Ella J. Swartz v. Bergendahl-Knight Company, an Illinois corporation. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Carnahan, J. Verdict for plaintiff for $5,400 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was in refusing defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

This is an action of trespass brought by Ella K. Swartz to recover damages for the death of her husband who was killed by the breaking of a scaffold upon which he was working while in the employ of the defendant company.

The plaintiff’s husband was a structural steel worker and riveter, and, on March 16, 1915, while he was engaged in assisting in the erection of the structural iron and «teel frame of the William Penn Hotel in the City of Pittsburgh, one of the two needle beams in the scaffolding on which he and other employees were working broke, causing the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finnerty v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Bannon v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Danner v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Schall v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Carr v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furman v. BrosciousSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Dollar Savings Fund & Trust Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Reilly v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Williams v. LewineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API