Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Reilly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1919No. Appeal, No. 92PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 92, Jan. T., 1919, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1915, No. 2504, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Matthew Reilly v. Thomas Reilly. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Shoemaker, J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,750. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Plaintiff, who was employed as a foreman in the erection of St. Mary’s College, went on a swinging scaffold to inspect the work of two bricklayers. He had been *104talking to the workmen for a minute or so when the scaffold lurched, or swayed, from an unknown cause, and, to prevent falling, he grasped the guard rail, when it dropped with him to the ground, the center upright post tearing loose from the scaffold.

The trial judge submitted to the jury the question of the defendant's negligence in not providing a safe place to work, and the important matter for their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swartz v. Bergendahl-Knight Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Stewart Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Furman v. BrosciousSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Mitchell v. ScharfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API