Bannon v. Lutz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 410, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, Hiram E. Lutz, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1891, No. 31, on verdict for plaintiff, Bridget M. Bannon. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Waddell, P. J., of 15th judicial district, specially presiding. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 410, Jan. T., 1892, by defendant, Hiram E. Lutz, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1891, No. 31, on verdict for plaintiff, Bridget M. Bannon. Trespass for personal injuries. Before Waddell, P. J., of 15th judicial district, specially presiding. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court charged in part as follows : “ [If Bannon was not negligent, if under the evidence you are satisfied that he did all he was required to do, and Mr. Lutz was negligent, then your verdict will be for the plaintiff and will be in such an amount as will compensate her…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice McCollum,
It is alleged by Bridget M. Bannon, appellee, tiiat on the 22d of February, 1889, her husband, John Bannon, lost his life in the service and through the negligence of Hiram E. Lutz, appellant, who then owned and operated a refinery known as the Delaware Oil Works. It appears that Bannon entered the service of Lutz as assistant stillman, about two months' before his death, and that in the performance of his duties as such he *172was required, inter alia, to remove the manheads from the stills from three to four hours after the fires were drawn. About half past…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Furman v. BrosciousSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Wilder ex rel. Wilder v. Great Western Cereal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Baumgartner v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Donnelly v. Lehigh Navigation Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Fullick v. South Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.