Legal Opinion

Robert R. Stalik v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1957No. 5533_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346. Appellant, Robert R. Stalik, sued the United States, charging it with negligence in loading a truck belonging to the Seiver Supply Company, a corporation, with surplus war material purchased by Seiver, and alleging that he suffered personal injuries directly attributable to the negligent conduct of the Government’s servants and employees. When plaintiff rested his case, the Court dismissed the action on the ground that there was no evidence tending to establish…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  2. Vogt v. SchienebeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kelley v. Summers Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Kelley (Two Cases). Kelley v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Harman v. Washington Fuel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Stoddard Wendle Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Robert W. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Commercial Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Ward v. McDan Dav Leasing CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Alfred Hofmann and Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API