Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Wooten v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStacy, C. J.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., concur in the opinion of STACY, C. J. Action for damages for injury and death of plaintiff's intestate alleged to have been caused by a collision between a bicycle on which he was riding and defendants' automobile, negligently driven by defendant, Mrs. Seth L. Smith. The collision occurred at the intersection of Madison and Williamson Streets in the town of Whiteville, North Carolina.

Upon issues submitted to the jury, there was verdict for the plaintiff, and from judgment in accord therewith, defendants appealed. The appellants' principal assignments of error…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Goff v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Kelly v. . HunsuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smart v. . RodgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Threatt Ex Rel. Threatt v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Barnes v. TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API