Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perry v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1920PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1DissentWalker, J.

This is one of three actions, two to recover damages for personal injury, and the third, damages for loss of services of a minor son, brought on account of injuries sustained at a public crossing by the train of the defendant striking an automobile in which the plaintiffs were.

The plaintiff Perry was driving the automobile. He testified as follows: "I was 55 years old last August, and live near Okisko. The railroad crosses the public road at Pasquotank station. The road has been there ever since I can remember. It was there and maintained by the county at the time the railroad laid its track…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Cooper v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Judson v. . Central Vermont R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Eller v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Johnson Sons, Inc. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Quinn Ex Rel. Quinn v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API