Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Litzke
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
There are, I apprehend, two essentials which must exist before any liability could arise in this case:(1) The respondent, while under 60, must have “become permanently disabled or physically or mentally incapacitated to such an extent that he by reason of such disability or incapacity is rendered wholly and permanently unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for any kind of compensation of financial value,” and(2) Due proof of such disability or incapacity must be furnished to the Company at or prior to the time the liability of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Hawkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Novellino v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Culley v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Holtz v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Miller v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.