Legal Opinion

Holtz v. New York Life Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 7, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This is an action to recover disability benefits under a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff’s intestate on November 25, 1921.

By its policy the defendant contracted to pay to the insured one per centum of the face value of the policy each month “during the lifetime of the insured and also to waive the payment of premiums, if the insured becomes wholly and permanently disabled before age sixty, subject to all the terms and conditions contained in section 1 hereof.”

By section 1, it is provided, inter alla, that

“Disability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Mobley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Baltimore Life Insurance v. FloydSupreme Court of Delaware · 1915
  4. Continental Insurance v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Delaware · 1909
  5. Jones v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Novellino v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. Ferguson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Seymour v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Laird v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
  5. State Life Ins. Co. of Indianapolis Ind. v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API