Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoeling, J.
— Plaintiff’s allegation is:
“That, on or about'the first day of March, 1922, the plaintiff, Clyde L.- Hawkins, became wholly and permanently disabled, and remained wholly and permanently disabled until November 1, 1925.”
It is a sufficient statement of the question, for the present, to' say that it is whether such a disability — one that has terminated — is “permanent,” within the meaning of the policy sued on. The policy is one of life insurance' calling' for $2,000. It contains the following:
“Total and Permanent Disability Benefit Provision.
“1. If after one full year’s premium shall have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ginell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Carson v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Shipp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Corsaut v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.