Legal Opinion

State v. Tolley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1976No. 7628SC182PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the failure of the court to grant his motion for judgment of dismissal. He contends that as a matter of law he is not guilty of breaking and entering because he had permission from an occupant of the home, the Rigsby’s son, Michael, to enter the home. We disagree.

A person entering a residence with the good faith belief that he has the consent of the owner or occupant or his authorized agent is not chargeable with the offense of breaking and entering. See 93 A.L.R. 2d 534, § 3, Rule that Consent Constitutes a Defense. However, the circumstances of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. . WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. . FriddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. UpchurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API