State v. Carey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
It was clearly error for the trial judge to refuse to permit the defendant (and the State) to interrogate prospective jurors concerning their views with reference to the imposition of the death penalty upon one convicted of murder in the first degree, and also error to refuse to permit the defendant, in his argument to the jury, to inform the jury that, under the law of this State, the prescribed punishment for murder in the first degree is death. State v. Anthony Douglas Carey, 285 N.C. 497, 206 S.E. 2d 213, decided this day; State v. Britt, 285 N.C. 256, 204 S.E. 2d 817.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.