Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1978No. 3443, 3448PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Defendants were convicted of burglary and larceny under $100. No sentence was imposed for the larceny convictions; the appeals are from the burglary convictions. See State v. Morris, 69 N.M. 89, 364 P.2d 348 (1961). Defendants were tried jointly, but took separate appeals which are hereby consolidated. The issues involve: (1) unauthorized entry, (2) surrebuttal evidence, and (3) identification of Ortiz.

Unauthorized Entry

The victim and her husband operate several businesses in Tucumeari. They keep coins in their home so that change will be available to the businesses…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KeysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. MorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. SelfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. DeatonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Johnston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Office of the Public Defender Ex Rel. MuqqddinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Templeton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API