Legal Opinion
Null v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1906No. Civ. No. 272PublishedCited by 11 opinions
PETITION for writ of review to annul a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County rendered upon appeal from a justice’s court. C. M. Head, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The following facts appear from the petition and the return: Petitioner is a resident of Shingle-town township, Shasta county, and executed his promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“$30.40 ■ Shingletown, Cal, Aug. 6, 1902.
“One day after date I promise to pay to the J. F. Bedford Co. or order, thirty & 40-100 dollars, interest at ten per cent per annum. E. M. NULL.”
The payee commenced an action on said note against the maker (petitioner here) in the justices’ courts of Anderson township, said county, at which time the maker was a resident of Shingletown township; summons was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Warner Bros. Co. v. FreudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Morton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bates v. FerrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Dreher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Couldthirst v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.