Legal Opinion

State v. Lilleskov

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 2003No. C3-02-1698, C8-02-1700PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This certified question was issued in two prosecutions for violations of the predatory-offender-registration statute, Minn.Stat. § 243.166 (2000). The two cases were consolidated by the district court for the purposes of the certified question, which asks whether the statute applies to defendants Henry Hicks and Todd Lilleskov, who have juvenile adjudications for sex-related offenses that were entered before the statute was amended to cover juvenile sex offenders. We answer the certified question in the affirmative.

FACTS

Defendant Todd Lilleskov, who was born August 18,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Lassen v. First Bank Eden PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. RonquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Risk Level Determination of M.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. State v. JedlickaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. WicknerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Danny Lee Zinski v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API