Minnwest Bank v. Arends
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this appeal from summary judgment in favor of respondent bank, appellant feed supplier asserts that its Kvestock production input Ken has priority over respondent’s security interest in the same Kve-stock. Appellant argues that the district court erred by concluding that appellant’s failure to comply with the notice requirements of Minn.Stat. § 514.966, subd. 3(b), prevented appellant from obtaining priority over respondent’s security interest. We affirm.
FACTS
In February 2005, respondent Minnwest Bank obtained an agricultural security interest in the Kvestock of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.