Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 11, 2012No. 091770MI; A143475PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant, who was convicted of DUII, argues that the trial court erred when it refused to allow defense counsel, pursuant to OEC 706, to impeach on cross-examination two police officers based on provisions of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Field Sobriety Test Instructor’s Manual (the NHTSA manual). In additional assignments of error, defendant challenges several other rulings in which the trial court excluded evidence pertaining to his medical condition, the effects of certain medication on that condition, and the reliability of field sobriety tests. Because we agree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. AffeldOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Cedartech, Inc. v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. LaskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. Salas-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. Hites-ClabaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API